Policies
Focus and Scope
The goal of the Journal of Nurse Anesthesiology and Perioperative Practice (JNAPP) (ISSN 3143-3308) is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed scholarly work dedicated exclusively to clinically grounded contributions in nurse anesthesiology and perioperative nursing. This journal will publish original papers on topics such as case reports, case series, clinical observations, practice-based insights, scoping reviews, rare complications and near miss events, evidence-based practice and quality improvement (QI) initiatives, and innovations in perioperative management. The journal will not publish traditional experimental research, randomized trials, or hypothesis-driven studies. Instead, it will serve as a rigorously reviewed platform for clinically meaningful, practice-facing scholarship. JNAPP will fill a significant gap in nurse anesthesia publishing by providing a venue where CRNAs, fellows, nurse anesthesia residents, perioperative nurses, and clinical leaders can disseminate insights directly relevant to patient care. The mission and vision of the journal are:
- Mission: To advance nurse anesthesia practice through the dissemination of high-impact clinical scholarship. The journal is dedicated to empowering nurse anesthetists with peer-reviewed, clinically relevant case-based scholarship to enhance patient safety and clinical excellence.
- Vision: To become the leading peer-reviewed journal for case-driven clinical insight into nurse anesthesia worldwide that transforms the landscape for perianesthesia care through the continuous exchange of evidence-based practice innovations.
This is an online journal that will use a rolling publication format. Occasional special issues are also published.
Peer Review Process
Submissions to the Journal of Nurse Anesthesiology and Perioperative Practice (JNAPP) are first reviewed by the editor to determine if they fit within the Focus and Scope of the journal. Submissions are then evaluated with a focus on clarity, rigor, and educational value by peer-reviewers who are experts in the subject matter of the article. The Journal of Nurse Anesthesiology and Perioperative Practice (JNAPP) submissions are peer-reviewed using a blinded process, meaning that the authors of the submission do not know the identity of those who review the submission unless released by the reviewer. The final decision to accept or reject a submission is made by the Editor and is based on the reports of the peer-reviewers.
Publication Frequency
The Journal of Nurse Anesthesiology and Perioperative Practice (JNAPP) is an online journal that will use a rolling publication format. Occasional special issues are also published.
Open Access Policy
Journals published by The Ohio State University Libraries provide immediate open access to their content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.To lower barriers to publication for authors, our journals do not charge submission or any other form of author fees.
While authors retain copyright ownership of their work, this Creative Commons license will allow readers to print, share, re-post, and republish an article, without asking for permission, as long as the work is properly attributed to the author(s). View the full legal text here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.en.
(Updated April 27, 2026)
Publication Ethics
The Journal of Nurse Anesthesiology and Perioperative Practice (JNAPP) is guided by the highest standards in publication ethics as outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in their Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.(Updated April 27, 2026)
Authorship
All published articles in JNAPP will contain clear and accurate attribution of authorship. The author is responsible for ensuring that everyone who contributed to the work is fairly acknowledged.
An author is defined using the ICMJE description:
- Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
- Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND
- Final approval of the version to be published; AND
- Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
If authorship disputes arise, the JNAPP editorial team will follow the COPE guidelines.
(Updated April 27, 2026)
Complaints and Appeals
Authors, reviewers, and editors are required to disclose conflicts of interest at the earliest possible opportunity - for example, when a manuscript is submitted or a review assignment is accepted. Conflict of interest is defined as any competing personal, professional, or financial interest that may introduce bias into the publishing process of the journal.
Example conflicts of interest:
- financial support from commercial enterprises that have a vested interest in the results
- personal relationships that would compromise objectivity during review or publication
- professional competition that would prevent objective evaluation of a submitted manuscript
Disclosure of a conflict of interest by an author does not necessarily mean that a manuscript will be denied acceptance to the journal. If an author is found to have a conflict of interest that was not disclosed during the submission and review process, the editor will identify an appropriate remedy, which may include a published correction or a retraction.
(Updated April 27, 2026)
Conflict of Interest
Authors, reviewers, and editors are required to disclose conflicts of interest at the earliest possible opportunity - for example, when a manuscript is submitted or a review assignment is accepted. Conflict of interest is defined as any competing personal, professional, or financial interest that may introduce bias into the publishing process of the journal.
Example conflicts of interest:
- financial support from commercial enterprises that have a vested interest in the results
- personal relationships that would compromise objectivity during review or publication
- professional competition that would prevent objective evaluation of a submitted manuscript
Disclosure of a conflict of interest by an author does not necessarily mean that a manuscript will be denied acceptance to the journal. If an author is found to have a conflict of interest that was not disclosed during the submission and review process, the editor will identify an appropriate remedy, which may include a published correction or a retraction.
(Updated April 27, 2026)
Copyright and Plagiarism
Copyright Policy
Authors retain all rights to work published by The Ohio State University Libraries' Publishing Program. The specific terms of our author agreements may vary slightly from journal to journal, but they all constitute nonexclusive licenses covering the rights required to publish, index, abstract, and preserve the content. Authors are free to reuse their work and to enter into other agreements as long as they credit the relevant journal as the site of first publication and provide a link to the journal website.
The Journal of Nurse Anesthesiology & Perioperative Practice is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License unless otherwise indicated.
Plagiarism Policy
JNAPP does not accept manuscripts with plagiarized material. For the purposes of this policy, plagiarism is defined as the use of previously authored works - including text, data, and images – of others or self without proper attribution.
The editors of JNAPP will respond to plagiarism at their discretion. Actions taken will be based on the severity of the plagiarism attempt, but can include corrections to or retractions of the published article, the author being banned from publishing in the journal, and/or the editor notification of the author’s institution or funding agencies.
(Updated April 27, 2026)
Ethical Oversight
JNAPP will promote the highest standards of research by ensuring that the published research is conducted in a fair and ethical manner. Wherever appropriate, published research based on human subjects will provide the name of the local ethics committee that approved the study (or confirmation that such approval is not needed). Any submissions that don’t meet these criteria will be returned to the authors.
(Updated April 27, 2026)
Post-Publication Corrections
When errors are discovered in published content, JNAPP will follow the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The following language is a brief summary of relevant portions of the guidelines for the benefit of our editors, authors, and readers. The full guidelines should be consulted if questions arise or action is being considered.
If the editor becomes aware of major errors in, or misconduct related to published work, the editor may issue a retraction, statement of concern, or correction. These actions are meant to maintain the scholarly record and are not meant to be a form of punishment. An author who determines that his or her published article may contain errors should contact the editor promptly so that the journal can determine a path forward. Readers are also invited to contact the editor with concerns about published content.
Retraction
A retraction is defined as a public disavowal, not an erasure or removal. Retractions will occur if the editors and editorial board find that the main conclusion of the work is undermined or if subsequent information about the work comes to light of which the authors or the editors were not aware at the time of publication.
Statement of Concern
A statement of concern will be issued if there is inconclusive evidence of research misconduct / ethical wrongdoing or there is an ongoing investigation and results are pending.
Correction
A correction will be published if the scholarly record is seriously affected (e.g., if accuracy / intended meaning, scientific reproducibility, author reputation, or journal reputation is judged to be compromised). Corrections such as misspellings or grammatical errors will not be published. Published corrections will be added to the original article whenever possible. When that is not possible, the correction will link to and from the original work.
Removal
Removal of published content may occur if an article is determined to be defamatory by a court of law, if it infringes on legal rights, or if there is a reasonable expectation that it will be subject to a court order for any reason. The bibliographic information about the work will be retained online, but the work will no longer be available through the journal. A note will be added to indicate that the item was removed for legal reasons.
(Updated April 27, 2026)
Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC)
Definitions
Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC), commonly referred to as material generated using AI, is unique content created by tools using predictions made via machine learning from LLMs (large language models) or SMLs (small language models.)
This policy covers the use of AIGC whether by authors, editors, or peer reviewers.
Authorship
JNAPP is in agreement with the following statement from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE):
AI tools cannot meet the requirements for authorship as they cannot take responsibility for the submitted work. As non-legal entities, they cannot assert the presence or absence of conflicts of interest nor manage copyright and license agreements.
Please review COPE’s Full statement on AI authorship.
Therefore, manuscripts should not list AI tools as coauthors when submitting to JNAPP.
Authors
If authors submitting to JNAPP have used AIGC in any portion of a manuscript, including text, data, images, graphics, videos, citations or translations, the tool and its use must be described in detail in the Methods and/or Acknowledgements sections of the manuscript, including prompts used if appropriate, and the full text of the original AIGC be attached as supplemental material. AIGC tools include, but are not limited to, GPT-4, ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Bard, DALL-E2, Midjourney, and other tools trained on Large Language Models (LLMs) or SMLs (small language models) that generate unique content based on predictions. This also applies to AIGC add-ons within software offered by Microsoft, Adobe and others, as well as online applications offered by Google, Zoom, Canva, Atlas.ti and others.
In the submission process authors will be asked to complete the following statement declaring any AIGC in the manuscript:
During the preparation of this work the author(s) used [NAME TOOL / SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the factual accuracy and originality of the material.
Standard grammatical aid tools that automate general spelling and grammar are not considered AIGC and are not required to be listed.
If authors discover sources through the use of AI tools, they must access those sources directly in order to use and cite them in their manuscripts.
In accordance with the above COPE statement:
- AIGC tools cannot be listed as authors.
- As with standard manuscript submission, the author is responsible for the accuracy of all information provided by the tool.
Editors
Selection of peer reviewers by JNAPP editors will not be done by AI tools and manuscripts submitted to JNAPP will not be uploaded into such tools. Authors submitting to JNAPP assume that their manuscript will be treated with confidentiality throughout the editorial and peer review process. As it is currently unclear how data ingested in AI tools is stored and reused, sharing any part of the manuscript including text, figures, graphs, and images violates the confidentiality authors expect when submitting manuscripts to JNAPP. As such, editors agree not to ingest the manuscript into AI tools to evaluate the material or find potential peer reviewers.
Editors may search AI supported discovery tools with keywords of their own design to assist in finding expert researchers in a particular field, much as they would consult resources such as Google Scholar or Scopus to find names of prominent authors in a given area of expertise.
Peer Review
Just as authors are accountable for the quality and integrity of their scholarly work, JNAPP holds peer reviewers to the same standard. At this point in time JNAPP does not allow the use of AI tools in the peer review of manuscripts because:
- AIGC tools are trained on past data whereas the peer review process is concerned with the evaluation of new research and the novel application of methodologies which can only be properly assessed by expert researchers in the field.
- AIGC tools at this point in time can replicate and amplify human bias rather than correct it in the peer review process.
- AIGC tools are often created and owned by private commercial interests and their processes are not transparent.
In addition, uploading manuscripts into AIGC tools potentially compromises authors' proprietary rights and confidentiality.
(Updated August 26, 2024. Adapted from The Journal Of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication's AI Policy.)
Preservation
This journal participates in the Public Knowledge Project's Private LOCKSS Network to preserve its contents. https://pkp.sfu.ca/pkp-pn/
(Updated April 27, 2026)
Research Involving Human and Animal Participants
All research involving human participants must be conducted with prior approval by the authors' institutional review board (IRB) or equivalent committee(s). In addition, informed consent must be obtained in advance and all clinical investigation must be conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
All research involving animal experiments must be approved by the authors' Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). In addition, it must be conducted according to the principles expressed in the WMA Statement on Animal Use in Biomedical Research.
Authors must be able to submit, upon request, a statement from the institutional review board, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, or equivalent committee(s) indicating approval of the research, and that board must be named in the manuscript.
(Updated April 27, 2026)